[ICTs-and-Society] Uppsala conference report
Jakob Rigi
rigij at ceu.hu
Mon Jan 7 11:54:38 PST 2013
Hello all,
Very good points Christian. But, if we approach this debate from the
point of a fully fledged communist society in future, recognition will,
still, remain a major issue. Imagine that we live in a society that
wealth is distributed according to need, not contribution of labor. In
such a society people are compensated for their contribution to
production by recognition by others. This will not promote egoism,
because, through such a recognition, the individual becomes immediately
social. The extension of every one`s individuality will not be
determined in an antagonistic relation (competition with) to others but
in the service to others and through their recognition. As Merton taught
us science has always been a communistic affair, and recognition is a
main means of reciprocity among scientists. Of course as Ursula pointed
out science and knowledge are the result of collective and cumulative
cooperation among numerous people from the Dawn of history. But, there
are those who, for what ever reason, make original contributions. And we
need to recognize this. Of course, I know that neo-liberalism has
commoditized fame. But, a healthy recognition still matter in any
egalitarian community.
best
Jakob
>>> Christian Fuchs 01/07/13 7:20 PM >>>
Hello all,
This is an interesting discussion about the nature and history of
Internet Studies.
I think a contemporary important question is, which forms of Internet
Studies there are, what the main topics are now and which ones are
emerging for the future, what the role of social theory, empirical
research, ethics and critique is or should be for Internet Studies, etc.
What kind of Internet Studies do we have? What kind do we desire? And
what kind do we need and what for?
Best wishes, Christian
Am 1/7/13 5:37 PM, schrieb Kaarle Nordenstreng:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> My response to Lazlo a while ago was written before seeing Ursula's
> flash in the list. She has a point but so have Lazlo and Niels Ole,
who
> -- like me -- just made a polite reminder of earlier research
tradition.
> Naturally we who have been personally involved in earlier research
often
> overemphasize its significance, but the scholarly community has also
an
> unhealthy tendecy to forget about "the shoulders of our predecessors".
>
> Ceterum censeo: sharp debate is welcome, but too sharp and personal
> turns are not conducive to a healthy growth an academic field.
>
> With best regards,
> Kaarle
>
> Lainaus Ursula Huws :
>
>> This seems to be a particularly pointless argument to be having.
>> Scholars in a variety of disciplines have been studying the internet
>> since the early 1990s. In many cases this built on earlier research
on
>> ‘socio-technical systems’, the ‘information society’ and numerous
>> other designations. To bring these discussions together under the
>> broad heading of ‘internet studies’ is useful. To pretend that in so
>> doing anyone has invented a new field of study is fatuous nonsense.
We
>> all stand on the shoulders of our predecessors. A failure to
recognise
>> this is a sign, not of originality, but of blinkered vision (possibly
>> combined with an over-inflated sense of self-importance).
>> Ursula Huws
>>
>> From: discussion-bounces at lists.icts-and-society.net
>> [mailto:discussion-bounces at lists.icts-and-society.net] On Behalf Of
Z.
>> Karvalics László
>> Sent: 07 January 2013 13:30
>> To: 'Niels Ole Finnemann'; 'Mathieu ONeil';
>> discussion at lists.icts-and-society.net
>> Subject: Re: [ICTs-and-Society] Uppsala conference report
>>
>> Dear Collegues,
>>
>> Just for the record, as a part of the landscape:
>> Other dedicated, systematic social science focused research on
>> Internet and society has been started around 2000 in research
>> institutes, devoted to information society research in Tampere (2001)
>> and Budapest (1998).
>> Best
>>
>> Laszlo Z. Karvalics
>>
>> From: Niels Ole Finnemann [mailto:finneman at imv.au.dk]
>> Sent: Monday, Janua>> Subject: Re: [ICTs-and-Society] Uppsala conference report
>>
>> Thanks a lot for these interesting accounts.
>> I have a very small correction however. In the opening it is said
>> “Internet studies have historically developed in the United States.
>> The Oxford Internet Institute (OII) was the first Internet research
>> centre to be launched in Europe, in 2001.”
>>
>> This is not quite correct as we initiated a Center for Internet
>> Research in September 2000 at Aarhus University in order “to promote
>> research on the social and cultural functions and meanings of the
>> internet”.
>> Prior to that we had a series of conferences on internet studies.
>> The center still exist and you can an overview of its history and
>> activities at http://cfi.au.dk/ - for the early history:
>> http://cfi.au.dk/news/2000/
>> Of course the OII have been much more influential, but anyway.
>> Best regards
>> Niels Ole Finnemann
>>
>> Fra:
>> discussion-bounces at lists.icts-and-society.net
>> [mailto:discussion-bounces at lists.icts-and-society.net] På vegne af
>> Mathieu ONeil
>> Sendt: 7. januar 2013 12:09
>> Til:
>> discussion at lists.icts-and-society.net
>>
>> Emne: Re: [ICTs-and-Society] Uppsala conference report
>>
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> In case you missed it, here is another account of the conference,
>> recently published in InMedia:
>>
>> Mathieu O'Neil, "Internet Studies in Europe. Symposium on Internet
and
>> Society, 25-28 October 2011, Humboldt University, Berlin; ICTs and
>> Society Conference, 2-4 May 2012, Uppsala University, Uppsala".
>>
>> http://inmedia.revues.org/489#article-489
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Mathieu
>>
>> On 01/07/13, Christian Fuchs
>> > wrote:
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> Please find below a link to a report on the Uppsala ICTs & Society
>> conference.
>>
>> Best, Christian
>>
>> Fuchs, Christian. 2012. Conference Report: The 4th ICTs and Society
>> Conference: Critique, Democracy and Philosophy in 21st Century
>> Information Society. Nordicom Information 34 (3-4): 89-99.
>> http://fuchs.uti.at/wp-content/NI.pdf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discussion mailing list
>> Discussion at lists.icts-and-society.net
>>
>>
http://lists.icts-and-society.net/listinfo.cgi/discussion-icts-and-society.net
>>
>> --
>> ****
>> Dr Mathieu O'Neil
>> Adjunct Research Fellow
>> Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
>> College of Arts and Social Science
>> The Australian National University
>> email: mathieu[dot]oneil[at]anu[dot]edu.au
>> web: https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/o-neil-m
>> ________________________________
>> A(z) üzenetben nem található vírus.
>> Ellenőrizte: AVG - www.avg.com
>> Verzió: 2013.0.2805 / Vírus adatbázis: 2637/6013 - Kiadás dátuma:
>> 2013.01.06.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion at lists.icts-and-society.net
>
http://lists.icts-and-society.net/listinfo.cgi/discussion-icts-and-society.net
>
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
Discussion at lists.icts-and-society.net
http://lists.icts-and-society.net/listinfo.cgi/discussion-icts-and-society.net
More information about the Discussion
mailing list