[ICTs-and-Society] Socialist technologies in the service of capitalism

MEICECC meicecc at gmail.com
Sat Jan 26 07:31:05 PST 2013


Dear Colleagues,

I just wanted to share this conference link with you!

The Sixth AASRC 2013 INTERNATIONAL Conference On “Innovative Trends in
Information Studies, Technologies, Computing and Engineering to tackle A
Competitive Global Environment” (ITITCE – 2013) 30 – 31 May 2013 ISTANBUL,
TURKEY
Sponsored by: International Certification Council
Organized by: American Academic & Scholarly Research Center

http://aasrc.org/conference/?p=660

Kindest regards,

Samer


On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:31 PM, José María Díaz Nafría <diaz-naf at hm.edu>wrote:

> ... As I pointed out in a previous post, I think that's to see the
> cybernetic movement in a very restricted manner. I know very bad cases of
> cybernetician working in a very simplistic, old-fashion manner -even very
> close to me-, people who even think the whole knowledge had to be adapted
> to their short-seeing -discounting most of the mathematical findings of the
> xx century, as mere noise... But as I saw in the Heinz von Foerster 100 -
> Self-organisation and Emergence - Conference 2011, the cybernetic movement
> -in a broad sense- is of course working on Self-organisation and Emergence
> which is completely coherent to what has been named 2nd order cybernetics
> since the 1970s... If both are updated, complex theory, cybernetics, as
> well as systems science altogether could be working in a joint manner. As
> far as I have seen often there's just terminological differences...
>
> Kind regards,
> José María
>
> 2013/1/25 Bob Logan <logan at physics.utoronto.ca>
>
>> Dear Petter - I agree with you that complexity theory with its feed
>> forward feature is the natural heir to cybernetics where the focus was
>> primarily on positive and negative feedback. Complexity theory and
>> emergence entails self-organization or feedforward and has a teleological
>> component to it. The goal of the emergent system is the system itself.
>> Stafford Beer who I had the good fortune to work with when he lived in
>> Toronto at the end of his life made use of feed forward in his management
>> cybernetics approach. The recent work of Deacon (Incomplete Nature) and
>> Ulanowicz (A Third Window) focuses on teleology and hence feedforward.
>> Thanks for your post - with kind regards - Bob Logan
>>
>>
>> On 2013-01-24, at 8:59 AM, Petter Törnberg wrote:
>>
>> I would second the point that the cybernetics movement was not
>> necessarily socialist. It did however have some interesting leftist
>> tendencies, likely due to its obvious potential on this account. For
>> example, Stafford Beers involvement in organizing Allende's Chile in
>> project Cybersyn (do read Eden Medina's excellent account of this
>> fascinating history: *Cybernetic Revolutionaries: Technology and
>> Politics in Allende's Chile, *2011), which  illustrates how attempts
>> were made to use cybernetics thinking to organize the future socialist
>> society.
>>
>> But I would furthermore question the notion that linear programming is
>> what we should look upon as the contemporary heritage of cybernetics;
>> instead, I would see Complexity Theory as its natural heir. In my view,
>> Complexity Theory - while of course similarly forged in the greedy flame of
>> capitalism - holds the same potential for thinking about the organizing and
>> transition to an alternative society.
>> There is actually a current EU project/coordination action, called INSITE
>> (www.insiteproject.org), that works with such a development in mind. The
>> project departs from an explicitly complexity theory-based criticism of the
>> capitalist organization of innovation and technological development, and
>> envisions alternative ways to organize innovation and production through
>> new decentralized and democratic institutions. Interestingly, the project
>> is strongly interdisciplinary and includes many mathematicians
>> and physicists.
>>
>> This, in my mind, illustrates that the last hope of a decent use of
>> cybernetics is yet to be extinguished.
>>
>>
>> Kind Regards
>> --
>> Petter Törnberg
>> PhD student in Complex Systems
>> at Chalmers University of Technology
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Bob Hughes <bob at dustormagic.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear listmembers,
>>>
>>> Linear programming (and other mathematical/cybernetic planning
>>> techniques) were seen by many people in the 1940s and 1950s as heralding
>>> the end of markets, as they offered radically more efficient means of
>>> distribution.
>>>
>>> Instead, I get the impression these techniques ended up helping Big
>>> Capital to push markets to new limits, via Enterprise Resource Planning
>>> (ERP) apps like SAP.
>>>
>>> Certainly, I understand that people trained in cybernetics and OR during
>>> the 1960s increasingly found they could only get work in corporate
>>> situations, where it was impossible to work on 'whole systems' in the
>>> proper, cybernetic sense.
>>>
>>> And linear programming seems to be the basis of the 'combinatorial
>>> auction' systems that have been so very profitably developed for handling
>>> sell-offs of public assets (UK buses in 1995, followed by the auctions for
>>> 3G and now 4G bandwidth, and I guess auctions for airline routes ... and
>>> maybe finding further, similar markets in countries that come under IMF
>>> privatisation-orders).
>>>
>>> If this is the case then there's a ginormously bitter irony here: what
>>> should have led to an age of low-impact abundance ended up being a
>>> power-tool for the manufacture of high-impact scarcity.
>>>
>>> Has anyone researched this, or can anyone point me in the direction of
>>> someone who has? Do you think the above is broadly correct?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Bob Hughes
>>> --
>>> Home: +44 (0)1865 726804 * Mobile: +44 (0)7968 292499 * Mail:
>>> bob at dustormagic.net
>>> Personal site: http://www.dustormagic.net | No One Is Illegal:
>>> http://www.noii.org.uk
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Discussion mailing list
>>> Discussion at lists.icts-and-**society.net<Discussion at lists.icts-and-society.net>
>>> http://lists.icts-and-society.**net/listinfo.cgi/discussion-**
>>> icts-and-society.net<http://lists.icts-and-society.net/listinfo.cgi/discussion-icts-and-society.net>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discussion mailing list
>> Discussion at lists.icts-and-society.net
>>
>> http://lists.icts-and-society.net/listinfo.cgi/discussion-icts-and-society.net
>>
>>
>>   ______________________
>>
>> Robert K. Logan
>> Chief Scientist - sLab at OCAD
>> Prof. Emeritus - Physics - U. of Toronto
>> www.physics.utoronto.ca/Members/logan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discussion mailing list
>> Discussion at lists.icts-and-society.net
>>
>> http://lists.icts-and-society.net/listinfo.cgi/discussion-icts-and-society.net
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Jose Maria Diaz Nafria
>
> Visiting Professor at the *Hochschule München* (HM, Germany,
> http://www.fh-muenchen.de/)
>     Postal Adress: Fakultät 13-Studium Generale, Dachauerstr. 100A, 80663
> München, GERMANY
> *Universidad de León *(ULE, Spain, http://www.unileon.es/)
>     Postal address: Esc.de Ingenierías Industrial e Informática, Campus de
> Vegazana s/n, 24071 Leon, SPAIN
>
> Coordination of *BITrum* Research Group (http://bitrum.unileon.es/)
> Coordination of *Glossarium BITri* (http://glossarium.bitrum.unileon.es/)
> Coordination of *DomusBITae* initiative (
> http://stylusbitae.bitrum.unileon.es/)
> *myUniversity* research team (http://www.e-myuniversity.eu/ule/)
> Board of Director, Institut für Design Science (IfDS, Munich, Germany,
> http://www.designscience.de/)
> Board of Directors, *Science of Information Institute* (SoII, Washington,
> USA, http://www.soii.info/)
> Board of Directors, *International Society for Information Studies* (ISIS,
> Vienna, Austria, http://is4is.unileon.es/)
> *Unified Theory of Information* Research Group (UTI, Austria,
> http://www.uti.at/)
> Editorial Board, *TripleC* Journal (http://www.triple-c.at)
> Editorial Board, *IRIE* Journal (http://www.i-r-i-e.net)
>
> Tf: HM (Germany): +49 89 1265 3110; ULE (Spain):  +34 987 091630; Fax: +34 987
> 29 11 35; +34 657 516306
> Skype: Jose Maria Diaz Nafria, jnafria
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion at lists.icts-and-society.net
>
> http://lists.icts-and-society.net/listinfo.cgi/discussion-icts-and-society.net
>
>


-- 
DISCLAIMER
This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual
or entity named above and may contain information that is privileged. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us
immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.icts-and-society.net/pipermail/discussion-icts-and-society.net/attachments/20130126/5563f604/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Discussion mailing list