[ICTs-and-Society] ECREA Pre-conference on "Imposing Freedoms" - Deadline extended to May 13th, 2012

Dimitris Tsapogas dimitrios.tsapogas at univie.ac.at
Wed May 9 11:45:08 PDT 2012


Dear colleagues, 

 

The ECREA 2012 Pre-conference on "Imposing Freedoms: The role of copyright,
privacy and censorship governance in the re/definition of rights in digital
media" abstract submission deadline has been extended to May 13th, 2012.


This event is co-organised by the Media Governance and Industries Research
Group (http://mediagovernance.univie.ac.at
<http://mediagovernance.univie.ac.at/> ) of the Department of Communication
Studies at the University of Vienna with the:

ECREA Communication Law and Policy Section
IAMCR Communication Policy and Technology (CP&T) and Law Sections
ICA Communication Law and Policy Division

It is hosted by the Plato College of Higher Education.

In the era of digital, global, around-the-clock communications, changes in
the practices and principles in the production, distribution and consumption
of the media raise pressing questions for media governance. Established
values in communication regulation -- from individual liberties to the
public interest, and from state security to the free market -- continue to
coexist, but often stand in conflict with each other, undergoing new
interpretations, often in the company of emerging principles. Tactics of
control are used by governments, corporations, communities, and citizens.
These deal with different subjects and have varying aims and degrees of
success, but all influence the ways in which the governance of communicative
action develops.

To a great extent, media governance values derive from the Enlightenment
project, regulating (or regularising) actions by citizens, states,
communities, and/or corporations. Liberty and freedom of expression,
self-governance and legitimacy, the rule of law, equality, and universality
of rights are understood to provide the underpinnings of national regulatory
and legal frameworks. Experience with the effects of legal efforts to
operationalise such concepts in the digital environment, however, changed
the way in which these values are understood. Individual freedom appears
fragile in the context of contemporary control and surveillance methods used
by both public and private sector entities.  Existing freedoms as provided
by, for example, the right to access information appear to be viewed as
imposing inconveniences that must be dealt with through new tactics of
control. In many contexts, freedom is increasingly being treated as a
‘transitive’ condition that is ‘imposed' on societies without reference to
actual needs or concomitant attention to justice as understood by those upon
whom control practices are being imposed and with selective attention to
international standards. Digital media governance models are called to deal
with the contemporary conflict between powerful intentions and fragile
conditions, individual freedoms and transnational influences, the political
enmeshment of the public and the private, and the effects of networks on the
structures of power. Drawing upon contemporary theories, governance is
understood as the formal and informal practices of institutions and private
and public sector actors. In the realm of digital media, this kind of
governance explicitly and/or implicitly frames social relations and vice
versa. This means that emerging forms of governance have implications for
our understanding of agency, democracy and citizenship.

This symposium invites theoretical, methodological and empirical papers with
a specific focus on actual or possible new values, doctrinal principles,
and/or implementation practices of media governance as they redefine,
reinterpret, operationalise, or abandon freedom as traditionally understood,
from the perspective of governments, corporations, communities, and also
citizens. Some suggested directions for enquiry include:

-What kinds of new or revived values are informing media governance? Which
models of governance are being promoted, and which are being sidelined?
-What experiences with alleged freedom, or alternative modes of
conceptualising freedom, test the validity, appropriateness, and efficacy of
current media governance practices worldwide?
-To what extent are governments applying new tactics and reconfiguring
regulatory values to maintain control over digital and physical spaces?
-How is globalization of the law affecting media governance at the national
level?
-Will the anti-terrorism and crisis ‘state of exception’ used by most
governments to justify significant changes in the treatment of free speech
and access to information endure?  If so, what are the implications of this
development for media governance in the future?
-In which ways are global corporations involved in the shaping of media
governance and what are the implications of these developments in
policymaking for the reconceptualisation of certain freedoms and rights
(e.g., in the areas of privacy, expression, and copyright)?
- To what extent and in which ways are the practices by citizens and
communities following, opposing and/or negotiating media (technology)
governance, and what are the consequences for agency, empowerment and
freedom of media users (e.g. in design/domestication of media,
tactics/strategies by public, democratic rationalisation)?
-Which models of media governance may be particularly fruitful for those
seeking guarantees of the legal, material and symbolic aspects of individual
and communal freedoms and identities?   What new tactics of control and
resistance are enabled by such models?
-In what ways can media regulation be responsible for the encroachment of
certain individual freedoms and rights despite appearing to try to preserve
those same freedoms and rights?

We are interested in dynamic panel debates and dialogue, and the development
of research agendas as an outcome of the event. For this reason there will
be a limited number of participants.

Confirmed speakers

Jonas Andersson, Södertörn University, Sweden
Alison Beale, Simon Fraser University, Canada
Sandra Braman University of Wisconsin, US
Mary Griffiths, University of Adelaide, Australia
Jo Pierson, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
Evangelia Psychogiopoulou, ELIAMEP Greece
Katharine Sarikakis, University of Vienna, Austria
Laura Stein, University of Texas, US
Asli Tunc, Istanbul Bilgi University, Turkey

Abstract Submission

Please submit your 400 words abstract along with your contact details and a
3 lines bio to mediagovernance.pkw at univie.ac.at.

Notification of abstract review May 20, 2012.

 

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. 

 

Sincerely, 

 

The Organising Committee
http://mediagovernance.univie.ac.at <http://mediagovernance.univie.ac.at/>  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.icts-and-society.net/pipermail/discussion-icts-and-society.net/attachments/20120509/6a2e4aeb/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Discussion mailing list